U.S. Rep Lieu hopeful for election security bill prospects

U.S. Representative Ted Lieu (D-CA) thinks that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s weakening opposition to gun legislation bodes well for the prospects of passing an election security bill. Several election security measures have stalled in Congress since the 2016 presidential election because McConnell has refused to take them up on the Senate side.

“I know that public sentiment has shifted on the gun issue so that Mitch McConnell is now willing to consider background checks on guns and red flag laws,” Lieu tells CSO Online. “That wasn’t something he had been saying a few weeks ago. So, you never know when something can happen that will shift public sentiment in such a way that will force him to take up a vote for election security.”

Lieu also called for continued exposure by the hacking community on the weaknesses in the nation’s election security infrastructure. One day after a bombshell report by cybersecurity researchers that nearly three dozen state election systems are exposed to hacking on the Internet, Lieu says “I think continual pressure from communities, especially the hacking community, that shows how these machines can be hacked will be helpful in getting an election security bill signed into law because it really drives home the issue that we really have weakness in our voting capability.”

Lieu’s comments came after a panel here at DEF CON on “hacking” the Congress. Jane Harman, former member of Congress and current president of The Wilson Center, kicked off the panel noting how difficult it is for most politicians to grasp digital technology problems. “Politics is an analog world and the problems politicians confront are digital,” she said. “A whole bunch of folks in Congress are still using flip phones.”

Harman painted a hypothetical, catastrophic scenario of a destructive cyber event and asked the two sitting members of Congress on the panel how they would react as Members of Congress. Representative James Langevin (D-RI) said that “we would hope the right processes are in place to have a whole of government response to a cyber incident.”

Langevin cited the 2016 election as a model when the U.S. was totally caught off guard regarding the degree to which Russia interfered in the U.S. elections. “We were not caught up in 2018. We were much better protected in 2018 but not perfect. It’s a work in progress.”